Pressure sores and wound care: when might poor care be negligent?
How risk assessments, repositioning, equipment, wound monitoring and escalation may be reviewed when a pressure sore causes avoidable harm.
Read article →Vaginal mesh claims can involve the advice given before treatment, surgical technique, recognition of complications and subsequent care. A recognised complication is not automatically negligent, so each case requires individual evidence.
A poor outcome alone does not prove negligence. The investigation considers what a reasonably competent healthcare professional should have done and whether any failure made a material difference to the outcome.
This can justify investigation depending on the clinical circumstances, available evidence and harm caused.
This can justify investigation depending on the clinical circumstances, available evidence and harm caused.
This can justify investigation depending on the clinical circumstances, available evidence and harm caused.
This can justify investigation depending on the clinical circumstances, available evidence and harm caused.
This can justify investigation depending on the clinical circumstances, available evidence and harm caused.
This can justify investigation depending on the clinical circumstances, available evidence and harm caused.
The investigation may consider what material risks and reasonable alternatives should have been discussed in the patient’s circumstances. A signed consent form does not by itself answer whether the discussion was adequate.
Pain, bleeding, infection, urinary problems, mesh exposure or erosion and other symptoms can require further assessment. The occurrence of a complication does not automatically establish negligence; the question is whether care was reasonable before, during and after treatment.
Appropriate experts may review the indication for treatment, consent, surgical records, later symptoms and whether any avoidable failure caused additional injury or treatment needs.
Relevant evidence depends on the circumstances. Common sources include:
The evidence is considered alongside the chronology and appropriate independent expert opinion.
The evidence is considered alongside the chronology and appropriate independent expert opinion.
The evidence is considered alongside the chronology and appropriate independent expert opinion.
The evidence is considered alongside the chronology and appropriate independent expert opinion.
Read about consent, treatment, complications and specialist evidence.
Understand why historic treatment and date of knowledge require individual advice.
Begin a sensitive and confidential initial enquiry.
Tell us what happened, when the treatment took place and how you were affected.
The key facts, limitation position and whether further investigation may be appropriate are considered.
Relevant medical records, chronology and evidence of any financial losses may be obtained.
Appropriate independent experts may address breach of duty, causation, condition and prognosis.
Where the evidence supports a claim, the relevant defendant can be notified and liability or settlement discussed.
The matter may conclude by agreement or, where necessary, through the court process.
There is no reliable generic calculator for medical negligence. Where liability is established, compensation can reflect the individual injury and financial consequences supported by evidence.
No. Complications can occur without negligence. The advice, treatment, follow-up and effect of any failure need individual assessment.
Potentially. The assessment may consider whether material risks and reasonable alternatives were discussed in a way that allowed an informed decision.
Limitation can be complex where an injury or its connection with treatment became apparent later. Prompt individual advice is important.
No. An initial enquiry can begin without complete records. Device and treatment information may be obtained if further investigation is appropriate.
How risk assessments, repositioning, equipment, wound monitoring and escalation may be reviewed when a pressure sore causes avoidable harm.
Read article →A practical guide to discharge decisions, pending results, medication, follow-up, safety-netting and avoidable harm after leaving hospital.
Read article →What a vaginal mesh claim may examine, including informed consent, surgical care, recognised complications and specialist evidence.
Read article →Use the claim checker if you are unsure where to start.
Tell us what happened and our team can explain the next steps.