Pressure sores and wound care: when might poor care be negligent?
How risk assessments, repositioning, equipment, wound monitoring and escalation may be reviewed when a pressure sore causes avoidable harm.
Read article →Care-home clinical negligence claims can involve failures to assess risk, administer medication, prevent avoidable injury or obtain appropriate medical help. Poor care alone does not establish a claim; the failure must have caused avoidable harm.
A poor outcome alone does not prove negligence. The investigation considers what a reasonably competent healthcare professional should have done and whether any failure made a material difference to the outcome.
This can justify investigation depending on the clinical circumstances, available evidence and harm caused.
This can justify investigation depending on the clinical circumstances, available evidence and harm caused.
This can justify investigation depending on the clinical circumstances, available evidence and harm caused.
This can justify investigation depending on the clinical circumstances, available evidence and harm caused.
This can justify investigation depending on the clinical circumstances, available evidence and harm caused.
This can justify investigation depending on the clinical circumstances, available evidence and harm caused.
Care homes have different staffing and clinical arrangements, but residents should receive care appropriate to their assessed needs. The investigation may consider the home’s responsibilities and when external medical help should have been requested.
Potential concerns can overlap, such as reduced mobility leading to pressure damage, poor intake contributing to deterioration or medication errors increasing falls risk. A chronology helps identify what happened and what difference reasonable care may have made.
A complaint, safeguarding enquiry and compensation claim have different purposes. Information from those processes may be relevant, but none automatically proves civil liability.
Relevant evidence depends on the circumstances. Common sources include:
The evidence is considered alongside the chronology and appropriate independent expert opinion.
The evidence is considered alongside the chronology and appropriate independent expert opinion.
The evidence is considered alongside the chronology and appropriate independent expert opinion.
The evidence is considered alongside the chronology and appropriate independent expert opinion.
See how records, risk assessments and medical escalation may be reviewed.
Read focused guidance on pressure-damage prevention and treatment.
Start an enquiry for yourself or a relative.
Tell us what happened, when the treatment took place and how you were affected.
The key facts, limitation position and whether further investigation may be appropriate are considered.
Relevant medical records, chronology and evidence of any financial losses may be obtained.
Appropriate independent experts may address breach of duty, causation, condition and prognosis.
Where the evidence supports a claim, the relevant defendant can be notified and liability or settlement discussed.
The matter may conclude by agreement or, where necessary, through the court process.
There is no reliable generic calculator for medical negligence. Where liability is established, compensation can reflect the individual injury and financial consequences supported by evidence.
Yes. Who can formally instruct solicitors or bring a claim depends on capacity, authority and the individual circumstances.
Not automatically. It may provide relevant evidence, but a civil claim still requires the legal tests for breach of duty and causation to be met.
Potentially, where reasonable risk assessment or precautions were omitted and that failure caused an avoidable injury. Not every fall can be prevented.
Care plans, daily notes, incident records, medication charts and health-service records can all be relevant, depending on the concern.
How risk assessments, repositioning, equipment, wound monitoring and escalation may be reviewed when a pressure sore causes avoidable harm.
Read article →A practical guide to discharge decisions, pending results, medication, follow-up, safety-netting and avoidable harm after leaving hospital.
Read article →What a vaginal mesh claim may examine, including informed consent, surgical care, recognised complications and specialist evidence.
Read article →Use the claim checker if you are unsure where to start.
Tell us what happened and our team can explain the next steps.