Pressure sores and wound care: when might poor care be negligent?
How risk assessments, repositioning, equipment, wound monitoring and escalation may be reviewed when a pressure sore causes avoidable harm.
Read article →Anticoagulants require careful prescribing, administration and monitoring. A claim may require investigation where an avoidable error or failure caused bleeding, clotting, stroke or another injury.
A poor outcome alone does not prove negligence. The investigation considers what a reasonably competent healthcare professional should have done and whether any failure made a material difference to the outcome.
This can justify investigation depending on the clinical circumstances, available evidence and harm caused.
This can justify investigation depending on the clinical circumstances, available evidence and harm caused.
This can justify investigation depending on the clinical circumstances, available evidence and harm caused.
This can justify investigation depending on the clinical circumstances, available evidence and harm caused.
This can justify investigation depending on the clinical circumstances, available evidence and harm caused.
This can justify investigation depending on the clinical circumstances, available evidence and harm caused.
Anticoagulants are used to reduce harmful clotting, but treatment can also increase bleeding risk. The appropriate medicine, dose and monitoring depend on the indication and the individual patient.
An investigation may consider weight, kidney function, other medicines, test results, procedural plans and communication between hospital, primary care, pharmacy and anticoagulation services.
An error alone is not enough. Medical evidence must address whether it probably caused or materially contributed to the bleeding, clotting or other avoidable injury.
Relevant evidence depends on the circumstances. Common sources include:
The evidence is considered alongside the chronology and appropriate independent expert opinion.
The evidence is considered alongside the chronology and appropriate independent expert opinion.
The evidence is considered alongside the chronology and appropriate independent expert opinion.
The evidence is considered alongside the chronology and appropriate independent expert opinion.
Read about prescribing, monitoring, communication and causation.
Explore other prescribing, dispensing and administration errors.
Begin with a short initial enquiry.
Tell us what happened, when the treatment took place and how you were affected.
The key facts, limitation position and whether further investigation may be appropriate are considered.
Relevant medical records, chronology and evidence of any financial losses may be obtained.
Appropriate independent experts may address breach of duty, causation, condition and prognosis.
Where the evidence supports a claim, the relevant defendant can be notified and liability or settlement discussed.
The matter may conclude by agreement or, where necessary, through the court process.
There is no reliable generic calculator for medical negligence. Where liability is established, compensation can reflect the individual injury and financial consequences supported by evidence.
No. The reason for the result, required response, monitoring arrangements and effect on the patient all need assessment.
Potentially, where the omission fell below a reasonable standard and caused avoidable harm. The clinical reason for treatment and likely effect of the omission matter.
Records can be used to reconstruct prescribing, monitoring and communication across the hospital, GP, clinic and pharmacy.
This page focuses on anticoagulants and their particular monitoring and bleeding or clotting risks. Other medicine concerns are covered by our general medication-error guidance.
How risk assessments, repositioning, equipment, wound monitoring and escalation may be reviewed when a pressure sore causes avoidable harm.
Read article →A practical guide to discharge decisions, pending results, medication, follow-up, safety-netting and avoidable harm after leaving hospital.
Read article →What a vaginal mesh claim may examine, including informed consent, surgical care, recognised complications and specialist evidence.
Read article →Use the claim checker if you are unsure where to start.
Tell us what happened and our team can explain the next steps.