Pressure sores and wound care: when might poor care be negligent?
How risk assessments, repositioning, equipment, wound monitoring and escalation may be reviewed when a pressure sore causes avoidable harm.
Read article →A discharge may require investigation where a patient was sent home or transferred without reasonable assessment, treatment, medication, safety-netting or support and their condition then worsened or avoidable harm followed.
A poor outcome alone does not prove negligence. The investigation considers what a reasonably competent healthcare professional should have done and whether any failure made a material difference to the outcome.
This can justify investigation depending on the clinical circumstances, available evidence and harm caused.
This can justify investigation depending on the clinical circumstances, available evidence and harm caused.
This can justify investigation depending on the clinical circumstances, available evidence and harm caused.
This can justify investigation depending on the clinical circumstances, available evidence and harm caused.
This can justify investigation depending on the clinical circumstances, available evidence and harm caused.
This can justify investigation depending on the clinical circumstances, available evidence and harm caused.
A patient does not need to be fully recovered before leaving hospital. The question is whether discharge was reasonable in light of the information available and whether appropriate treatment, advice and follow-up were arranged.
The investigation may consider observations, pending results, capacity and mobility, medication, home circumstances and the plan for further care.
Some patients reasonably need to return even after an appropriate discharge. A claim normally requires evidence that the original decision or plan fell below a reasonable standard and caused a worse outcome.
Records from the hospital and the services that received the patient can establish what was known, communicated and arranged. A clear timeline can identify gaps in assessment, handover or escalation.
Relevant evidence depends on the circumstances. Common sources include:
The evidence is considered alongside the chronology and appropriate independent expert opinion.
The evidence is considered alongside the chronology and appropriate independent expert opinion.
The evidence is considered alongside the chronology and appropriate independent expert opinion.
The evidence is considered alongside the chronology and appropriate independent expert opinion.
Understand discharge decisions, follow-up, safety-netting and useful evidence.
Learn how an NHS medical negligence claim may be investigated.
Tell us what happened using five short questions.
Tell us what happened, when the treatment took place and how you were affected.
The key facts, limitation position and whether further investigation may be appropriate are considered.
Relevant medical records, chronology and evidence of any financial losses may be obtained.
Appropriate independent experts may address breach of duty, causation, condition and prognosis.
Where the evidence supports a claim, the relevant defendant can be notified and liability or settlement discussed.
The matter may conclude by agreement or, where necessary, through the court process.
There is no reliable generic calculator for medical negligence. Where liability is established, compensation can reflect the individual injury and financial consequences supported by evidence.
Potentially, but readmission alone is not enough. The assessment considers whether the earlier discharge was unreasonable and whether it caused avoidable harm.
Safety-netting generally means clear advice about expected recovery, warning signs, when and where to seek help, and any planned review or investigation.
Yes, where reasonable follow-up should have been arranged and the omission caused a harmful delay or deterioration.
Health and care records may both be relevant. The legal position depends on each organisation’s role and the evidence about what should have happened.
How risk assessments, repositioning, equipment, wound monitoring and escalation may be reviewed when a pressure sore causes avoidable harm.
Read article →A practical guide to discharge decisions, pending results, medication, follow-up, safety-netting and avoidable harm after leaving hospital.
Read article →What a vaginal mesh claim may examine, including informed consent, surgical care, recognised complications and specialist evidence.
Read article →Use the claim checker if you are unsure where to start.
Tell us what happened and our team can explain the next steps.